Now that you are planning your marriage it is vital to think about your marriage video. Doing the whole thing yourself may be a lot cheaper and even though the technology is superb when it comes to equipment as described below, it is always better to get a professional to do the work if you need something really unique to keep as a memento.
All professional wedding video Sydney based companies use state of the art equipment, the one thing that sets them apart is the quality of work that they do, and this typically is reflected by their qualifications and experience. Your marriage video is going to be something that you will cherish over the years so it’s vital the person doing the shooting has some good testimonials from prior clients.
Marriage plans take time and so there is no actualneed to jump into getting a wedding videographer Sydney based company, take your time and make sure that they will provide you with an excellent production as a cherished souvenir. If you decide that you will do the honeymoon and wedding video yourself, you may think about using the Canon EOS 5D as it is a great camera for both videos and photographs.
Given the superb qualities that the Canon EOS 5D Mark II has, offering a full 21.1 megapixel and an HD movie capability ; one has to ask the question, if this is the point where photographers and videographers will be doing the same job. Considering it, having only one kit for two purposes should be the ‘it’ gadget. Considering that you don’t have to carry heavy heaps of cameras, stands and lenses, having just one little camera should do the job. But is it really up to it? Are we really into it?
There is an interesting convergence taking place though that’s being driven by the hardware makers. Increasingly video capture is being found in everything from mobile telephones and PDAs to dig cams. Also, the cost of near-broadcast quality video gear has dropped to the point that cameras and revising systems that were the vision of creative film makers just a short while back are now reachable of almost everybody.
Taking an effective photograph means telling a tale in a single image. Thru selection of subject, composition, focus, cropping and so on, the photographer selects those things that he wants to convey the meaning intended, or not. This is a demanding art as well as craft. With film or video, motion pictures as they once were universally called, there is the added element of multiple perspectives achieved thru revising, as well as sound. A mood can be made. A complex story can be told. The spectator’s perceptions and feelings can be manipulated to achieve the creator’s informative or emotional ends. But this is peculiar, at least to the quality standard that we have set. Most similar productions require 2, or three, or more folk with specialised talents to do the same thing.
Nevertheless, even those of us with lesser experience and abilities can still find pleasure in producing short videos and still photos that may be creatively satisfying, and also even achieve wider recognition. The point is that for some folks video production could be a extraordinarily satisfying accessory to still photography, if not a real alternative. And, with the new generation of hi-def equipment which has just become available this year at down to earth prices, the visual quality of what can be produced is nothing short of fantastic.
So, will this be the medium of the future? What will this be called? What will you call the person that is both photographer and a videographer? There’s just so much difference that both mediums are arguing with each other which one is best. Merging both will be difficult as it is confusing in a way that in an artist’s standpoint, a picture says more than 1,000 words silently than a video that announces everything in motion and in words.
If I am going to have my own opinion, using just one piece of equipment for photography and videography should be best kept for the fans and newbs alike. Professionals are keener on customs ; they need to be left with what they are trained to do. A should stick to his SLR, and a videographer stick with his video camera. In exclaiming this though, the professional wedding videographer is drawn to the Canon 5D SLR purely for its ability to provide amazing video pictures, usually only seen in 100k plus video cameras. The sole downside is, the SLR is primarily built for taking photos and not a lot of thought is given to the ergonomics and functionality for videos. ( Maybe with its recognition among film makers this can shortly change ). With the comparisons of differences and similarities, it is concluded that in this time, it isn’t sufficient for both parties to combine as a one job outline. Perhaps two more years perhaps.